After being asked about why the Parkzone UM P-51 made it onto my "Avoid" list, I decided to post this "catch-up" mini-review. This article is a little different than most, I elected not to maintain my PZ UM P-51 since it never flew well for me.
The reasons for that are several. My mini Mustang was a squirrelly little bird anytime I strayed any real distance from center of the flight regime. I've read others who have had better experiences, but they might be more content dwell closer to the heart of the envelop than I am. Alternatively, it could be a quality control thing, as plenty of this old Ultra Micro design is prone to failure or misalignment.
Part of the problem stems from first generation Horizon Hobby UM construction, which was and often still is, unacceptably weak in key areas of the build. The vertical tail of the Mustang is very flimsy, as is the horizontal stabilizer. This is likely a source of inconsistency as well as substandard flight handling.
The silly-cheap under cambered airfoil is not well suited to the warbird theme of the plane, causing the pitch axis to become too unpredictable across a wide airspeed range. Air can billow asymmetrically in the pocket underneath at low speeds, resulting in some nasty stall behavior, while the wing can tuck at higher speeds as the lack of a true airfoil snags a variety of stability perturbations.
Additionally brushed can motor is unreliable over time, I've replaced many for various issues from internal failure to wires separating. The usual HH PCB micro servos are weak, slow, and unreliable with regular use, and the tail control horns tended to tear at the ultra-thin foam hinges as a result of normal wear and tear. The plane, like so many micros in its class, exhibits a definite half-life of decay whether you baby it or not..
Lastly, the P-51 design itself looks a lot better than it feels when out of its element. This was a plane designed for extreme efficiency and power at high altitudes and airspeeds. It is beautiful to look at, but it was never designed to be a pleasant low-speed ride. Quite the contrary, the WWII Mustang was always an aptly named, ornery steed in need of experienced taming during administrative flying.
It all adds up to a price that's way too high for the opportunity cost. My overall grade is: D+
Wednesday, August 3, 2011
Z8RC Open Discussion
Feedback | Suggestions | Questions
Please note, reader comments do not appear immediately after hitting submit.
Please note, reader comments do not appear immediately after hitting submit.
I like to fly:
Top 10 This Week
-
This area is for feedback, suggestions, or questions about any topic...
-
UPDATE: Also see: Half of DX8 users report "unresolved" problems UPDATE: Also see: Head to Head: Aurora 9 vs Spektrum DX8 ...
-
INTRODUCTION It is sooo past time for a Jug. SPECS - Wingspan: 1400mm (55.1 inch) - Length: 1250mm (49.2 inch) - Flying Weight: 2100g (...
-
Nice looking little plane, but the beauty of this bugger is more than skin deep pole·cat ( n). A chiefly nocturnal European carnivoro...
-
Update: Out of curiosity I swapped out the Super Tigre for a Power 10. Results: little T:W difference and very nose heavy. Recommend an S...
-
I like to collect classic airplanes, so the gorgeous little Great Planes Electrifly Fokker Dr.1 Tridecker was a natural choice. Great Plane...
-
Chris wrote... The F4U is too small and light for my CG tool from Great Planes. Where should the CG be based on your experience and how ...
-
Anyone who’s flown the Blade 103 X will tell you, the tail was botched badly. The vibration problem: Horizon Hobby wanted to use a Z8RC m...
-
Can Z8RC's mad scientists double the speed of the Carbon Z Scimitar with a UM Stryker 180 hopped up on a 3S crack adrenalin rush? Resul...
Top 10 This Month
-
This area is for feedback, suggestions, or questions about any topic...
-
Chris wrote... The F4U is too small and light for my CG tool from Great Planes. Where should the CG be based on your experience and how ...
-
There are a lot of people mundanely peddling motors on the common RC message boards. If you were in the business, wouldn't you? The sal...
-
I've written about this subject before, but this diagram should help clarify how easy it is to add your own LED lighting for just a few ...
-
INTRODUCTION It is sooo past time for a Jug. SPECS - Wingspan: 1400mm (55.1 inch) - Length: 1250mm (49.2 inch) - Flying Weight: 2100g (...
-
Computer simulation has gotten good enough to be useful for learning to fly RC. Some might even say a good sim is a modern necessity. Can ...
-
In this series of posts, I will occasionally try to perpetuate common pet peeves of the pilot community. There is a right way and a wrong ...
-
The Round 1 bell approaches, with the simply outstanding Art-Tech ready to take on the Great Planes Electrify EP E-Performance Series Yak-5...
-
UPDATE: Also see: Half of DX8 users report "unresolved" problems UPDATE: Also see: Head to Head: Aurora 9 vs Spektrum DX8 ...
Z8RC Resources
A Practical RC Simulator Comparison
AMA Under the Microscope (& Part 2)
Balancing a ducted fan or prop perfectly
Balsa or Foam?
Blade mCP X 100% Vibration Fix
Choosing the Right Motor
FAA Guarantees Your Right to Fly RC in the USA
Fixing those broken UM wheel pants
How to Land from The Overhead Pattern
Online RC Discount Codes
Soft Throttle
Understanding CG
Z8RC Thrust-to-Weight Ratio Database
Z8RC Manufacturer Rankings