After being asked about why the Parkzone UM P-51 made it onto my "Avoid" list, I decided to post this "catch-up" mini-review. This article is a little different than most, I elected not to maintain my PZ UM P-51 since it never flew well for me.
The reasons for that are several. My mini Mustang was a squirrelly little bird anytime I strayed any real distance from center of the flight regime. I've read others who have had better experiences, but they might be more content dwell closer to the heart of the envelop than I am. Alternatively, it could be a quality control thing, as plenty of this old Ultra Micro design is prone to failure or misalignment.
Part of the problem stems from first generation Horizon Hobby UM construction, which was and often still is, unacceptably weak in key areas of the build. The vertical tail of the Mustang is very flimsy, as is the horizontal stabilizer. This is likely a source of inconsistency as well as substandard flight handling.
The silly-cheap under cambered airfoil is not well suited to the warbird theme of the plane, causing the pitch axis to become too unpredictable across a wide airspeed range. Air can billow asymmetrically in the pocket underneath at low speeds, resulting in some nasty stall behavior, while the wing can tuck at higher speeds as the lack of a true airfoil snags a variety of stability perturbations.
Additionally brushed can motor is unreliable over time, I've replaced many for various issues from internal failure to wires separating. The usual HH PCB micro servos are weak, slow, and unreliable with regular use, and the tail control horns tended to tear at the ultra-thin foam hinges as a result of normal wear and tear. The plane, like so many micros in its class, exhibits a definite half-life of decay whether you baby it or not..
Lastly, the P-51 design itself looks a lot better than it feels when out of its element. This was a plane designed for extreme efficiency and power at high altitudes and airspeeds. It is beautiful to look at, but it was never designed to be a pleasant low-speed ride. Quite the contrary, the WWII Mustang was always an aptly named, ornery steed in need of experienced taming during administrative flying.
It all adds up to a price that's way too high for the opportunity cost. My overall grade is: D+
Wednesday, August 3, 2011
Z8RC Open Discussion
Feedback | Suggestions | Questions
Please note, reader comments do not appear immediately after hitting submit.
Please note, reader comments do not appear immediately after hitting submit.
I like to fly:
Top 10 This Week
-
Anyone who’s flown the Blade 103 X will tell you, the tail was botched badly. The vibration problem: Horizon Hobby wanted to use a Z8RC m...
-
Recently we've had a few of the moderators from wattflyer attempt to place personal attacks and clownish remarks on Z8RC; what they cre...
-
INTRODUCTION It is sooo past time for a Jug. SPECS - Wingspan: 1400mm (55.1 inch) - Length: 1250mm (49.2 inch) - Flying Weight: 2100g (...
-
Individual model recommendations are based on an overall grade of B- or higher. This overall tabulation revealed that covers the 67th per...
-
Chris wrote; "I don't have a good understanding of washout, its relationship to tip stalling and how the seemingly common practi...
-
Update: Here is the Fw-190 with a Power 10 running on 3S (4S is not a Power 10 option). It achieves about the same speed as the stock airp...
-
Continuing and ending my mini-series on how to land, this article focuses on flying a good traffic pattern: the military Overhead. The Ove...
-
Update 7.24/2012: Also see The Overhead Pattern It struck me recently, while listening to someone try to explain how to land to another...
-
Ok, I know that Yak vs.Yak isn't exactly the same kind of comparison when you allow mods, but some of these planes leave so much room in...
-
Great Planes' new fleet of universally-compatible 2.4GHz Transmitter-Ready (TxR) aircraft include a revolutionary concept. These park...
Top 10 This Month
-
Update: Also see: Fixing the Flyzone Fokker Dr.1 Micro Update: After all that was discussed below, the little Fokker's motor shaft r...
-
In another Lucy and Charlie Brown place kicking moment, a trim button cracked-- AGAIN --in my newest DX6i while my excellent little Durafly ...
-
Update: See h ttp://z8rc.blogspot.com/2012/07/blitzrcworks-g4-quad-charger-thunder-t6.html for more charging options. Update 7/5/12: The ...
-
I decided to start this blog because the largest RC sites, like RCGroups.com, are corrupt. They only allow positive reviews of products of...
-
Z8RC Quick Take Killing time at the airport, I was shocked to see an electric flight Magazine in a small newstand - they never carry RC ma...
-
Individual model recommendations are based on an overall grade of B- or higher. This overall tabulation revealed that covers the 67th per...
-
Addendum: As a result of my review, Horizon lowered the price of the UMX Beast to $99, earning it a B+ Z8RC overall rating. Horizon deserv...
-
Update: I tested a single battery solution by tapping 2S receiver power from the 3S balance port. While not as elegant as a discrete recei...
-
Update: Shortening the front 2 of 4 landing gear struts by slicing off the existing anchors, making them shorter by an 1/8th inch when rein...
-
Completed model including guide wires, painted prop and 9 cylinder radial. Update 11: Paint and landing gear mods. I added two 2 mm c...
Z8RC Resources
A Practical RC Simulator Comparison
AMA Under the Microscope (& Part 2)
Balancing a ducted fan or prop perfectly
Balsa or Foam?
Blade mCP X 100% Vibration Fix
Choosing the Right Motor
FAA Guarantees Your Right to Fly RC in the USA
Fixing those broken UM wheel pants
How to Land from The Overhead Pattern
Online RC Discount Codes
Soft Throttle
Understanding CG
Z8RC Thrust-to-Weight Ratio Database
Z8RC Manufacturer Rankings