After being asked about why the Parkzone UM P-51 made it onto my "Avoid" list, I decided to post this "catch-up" mini-review. This article is a little different than most, I elected not to maintain my PZ UM P-51 since it never flew well for me.
The reasons for that are several. My mini Mustang was a squirrelly little bird anytime I strayed any real distance from center of the flight regime. I've read others who have had better experiences, but they might be more content dwell closer to the heart of the envelop than I am. Alternatively, it could be a quality control thing, as plenty of this old Ultra Micro design is prone to failure or misalignment.
Part of the problem stems from first generation Horizon Hobby UM construction, which was and often still is, unacceptably weak in key areas of the build. The vertical tail of the Mustang is very flimsy, as is the horizontal stabilizer. This is likely a source of inconsistency as well as substandard flight handling.
The silly-cheap under cambered airfoil is not well suited to the warbird theme of the plane, causing the pitch axis to become too unpredictable across a wide airspeed range. Air can billow asymmetrically in the pocket underneath at low speeds, resulting in some nasty stall behavior, while the wing can tuck at higher speeds as the lack of a true airfoil snags a variety of stability perturbations.
Additionally brushed can motor is unreliable over time, I've replaced many for various issues from internal failure to wires separating. The usual HH PCB micro servos are weak, slow, and unreliable with regular use, and the tail control horns tended to tear at the ultra-thin foam hinges as a result of normal wear and tear. The plane, like so many micros in its class, exhibits a definite half-life of decay whether you baby it or not..
Lastly, the P-51 design itself looks a lot better than it feels when out of its element. This was a plane designed for extreme efficiency and power at high altitudes and airspeeds. It is beautiful to look at, but it was never designed to be a pleasant low-speed ride. Quite the contrary, the WWII Mustang was always an aptly named, ornery steed in need of experienced taming during administrative flying.
It all adds up to a price that's way too high for the opportunity cost. My overall grade is: D+
Wednesday, August 3, 2011
Z8RC Open Discussion
Feedback | Suggestions | Questions
Please note, reader comments do not appear immediately after hitting submit.
Please note, reader comments do not appear immediately after hitting submit.
I like to fly:
Top 10 This Week
-
Update: After flying a lot of foamie warbirds belonging to me and others, the J-Power P-38 wins as Z8RC's overall best foam warbird. ...
-
Get ready for some hard WWI 3D action. Some ask, “Why?” I ask, “Why not?” PZ Albatros with Rimfire 15, 11x3.8 SF prop, HK Flight Stab...
-
Can Z8RC's mad scientists double the speed of the Carbon Z Scimitar with a UM Stryker 180 hopped up on a 3S crack adrenalin rush? Resul...
-
This $7 gem does all of the above: Consider: Two 3-cell 20C 1300mAh LiPo = $13.98 (= 2600mAh and 40C discharge) One 3-cell 40C 2650m...
-
The Hobby King P-38 did very well in my recent review - but that's even more reason to upgrade the airplane. The MAS 9x7x3-blade pus...
-
Scores from Round 1 will be posted shortly. Next up is the Great Planes Yak-55M Sport/Scale Aerobatic EP ARF 50". Another mouthful. A...
-
As I test fly, and quickly iterate the GP Yak-55M, one need that became very apparent was a wheel brake solution to operate this big boy out...
-
The "Monster" is in the house ...let the next round of flight testing begin. You know your Yak is a monster when... Its four ...
-
Update 9/24/2012: I decided to adjust the AS3X gains since my 130 seems slightly over-gained, with routine minor tail oscillations and an o...
Top 10 This Month
-
Update 3: See also: http://z8rc.blogspot.com/2012/01/blade-mcp-x-100-tail-blow-out-fix.html Update 2: mCP X with Z8RC truss upgraded to A...
-
I've gone to a soft throttle approach with my powerful airplanes. Some helicopter ESCs use a "soft start" to protect the ge...
-
Update 7.24/2012: Also see The Overhead Pattern It struck me recently, while listening to someone try to explain how to land to another...
-
Great looking 34" span model handicapped by E-Flite's lack luster UMX value proposition. Hmmm... high price, looks great, no ...
-
I've been wanting to buy a warbird with a big engine compartment to install my single-shaft, double-brushless motor concept (post coming...
-
I like to collect classic airplanes, so the gorgeous little Great Planes Electrifly Fokker Dr.1 Tridecker was a natural choice. Great Plane...
-
Update 5/15/12: Today the double-throttle configuration saved the model when the #2 engine blew while initiating an outside loop. After...
-
Parkzone Extra 300 PnP 41" wingspan $185 VS Electrifly Edge 540 ARF 41" Wingspan $105 + (4 servos @ $40) + (ST .1...
-
Update: Downgraded to D+ , see: CX3 on 3S Update: I decided to try an aluminum swash to see if it improved the precision of the heli. W...
Z8RC Resources
A Practical RC Simulator Comparison
AMA Under the Microscope (& Part 2)
Balancing a ducted fan or prop perfectly
Balsa or Foam?
Blade mCP X 100% Vibration Fix
Choosing the Right Motor
FAA Guarantees Your Right to Fly RC in the USA
Fixing those broken UM wheel pants
How to Land from The Overhead Pattern
Online RC Discount Codes
Soft Throttle
Understanding CG
Z8RC Thrust-to-Weight Ratio Database
Z8RC Manufacturer Rankings